美国司法部希望谷歌出售Chrome浏览器，并可能出售Android操作系统。

司法部周三宣布了它希望美国法官在发现谷歌在在线搜索中拥有垄断地位后采取的措施。司法部希望谷歌将Chrome“出售给由原告自行批准的买家，但须在法院和原告批准的条件下进行。”此外，谷歌在本最终判决期间“不得在未经法院批准的情况下发布任何其他谷歌浏览器。”目前，政府没有要求谷歌立即出售Android，但希望在其他措施未能恢复竞争时，有这个选项。总体来说：

为避免歧义，谷歌不得为Android或谷歌拥有的应用或数据提供优于其对所有其他GSEs和AI产品的访问权限。

谷歌不能：

• “make any Google GSE [general search engine], Search Text Ads, or AI Product (including on-device AI) mandatory on Android Devices”
• “reduce, prevent, or otherwise interfere with the distribution of rival GSE, Search Text Ads, or AI Products on Android Devices”

这表明，如果谷歌不想采取这些措施，它可能会“完全剥离Android，将其出售给由原告在他们独自行使的批准的买家”。迈克尔·巴尔的顶级评论 19人点赞 美国司法部也对苹果公司提起诉讼，但鉴于特朗普和库克的关系比特朗普和皮查伊要好，我认为那起诉讼可能会被放弃。美国政府将正式把智能手机市场交给苹果，就像在银盘上一样。重视一致性的普通用户不会去使用已经分散在生态系统中的安卓系统，因为他们依赖的应用程序不再像以前那样协同工作。查看所有评论同时，还有其他一系列请求：

• Google cannot pay or offer “other commercial terms” to Apple and third-parties that disincentive them from making their own search engine or search text ads. Revenue share payments are also prohibited.
• Google has to make Search and ads data available to third-parties to allow for the creation of competitors. This “syndication of search results” must be in effect for 10 years.
• “Google must provide online Publishers, websites, and content creators an easily useable mechanism to selectively opt-out of having the content of their web pages or domains used in search indexing; used to train or fine-tune AI models, or AI Products”
  • “Google must not retaliate against any Publisher, website, or content creator who opts-out pursuant to this provision.”

谷歌将在下个月提交自己的提案。之后（通过《Associated Press》、《The Verge》），届时将由新政府监管的司法部将在3月再次提交提案，在4月的听证会之前，法官将在2025年9月之前做出最终裁决。今晚，谷歌将该提案称为“极端”并表示它“过于广泛”。该公司对它将如何进行提出异议。

• Endanger the security and privacy of millions of Americans, and undermine the quality of products people love, by forcing the sale of Chrome and potentially Android.
• Require disclosure to unknown foreign and domestic companies of not just Google’s innovations and results, but even more troublingly, Americans’ personal search queries.
• Chill our investment in artificial intelligence, perhaps the most important innovation of our time, where Google plays a leading role.
• Hurt innovative services, like Mozilla’s Firefox, whose businesses depend on charging Google for Search placement.
• Deliberately hobble people’s ability to access Google Search.
• Mandate government micromanagement of Google Search and other technologies by appointing a “Technical Committee” with enormous power over your online experience.